Tian-Tian Sun vs Junri Namigata Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W W L
Form
L W W L L L W L L LH2H: Sun 1 - 0 Namigata
They have played 2 sets in total, with Sun winning 2 and Namigata winning 0. The last match between Sun and Namigata was at the Guangzhou International Women's Open 2009 - Guangzhou, 12-09-2009, Q1 round, Hard with Tian-Tian Sun getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tian-Tian Sun | 1 |
| Junri Namigata | 0 |
Guangzhou International Women's Open 2009 - Guangzhou(12-09-2009)
6
1
6
2
| Sun | Stats | Namigata |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-2) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 876 |
| 77 | Highest Rank | 105 |
| 43 | Age | 42 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 3 | Titles | 7 |
| 56% (159-127) | Career Total W/L | 55% (474-395) |
| $170,010 | Career Prize Money | $115,575 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Quinn VS Mensik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Kenin VS Sun PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Tian-Tian Sun Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 1-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | |||
| R2 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats 
Yurika Sema
Player
Tian-Tian Sun
66%
(
68 of
103)
1st Serve %
70%
(
73 of
105)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
59%
(
40 of
68)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
42 of
73)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
45 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
44 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Junri Namigata Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Akiko Omae
Player
Junri Namigata
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
68%
(
45 of
66)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Natsuho Arakawa
Player
Junri Namigata
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
58%
(
52 of
89)
8
Aces
2
13
Double Faults
7
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
33%
(
14 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
41 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
35 of
89)
96
Total Points Won
95
|
1-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ekaterina Shalimova
Player
Junri Namigata
40%
(
17 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
7
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Nana Kawagishi
74%
(
76 of
103)
1st Serve %
77%
(
86 of
112)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
51%
(
39 of
76)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
50%
(
51 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
59 of
112)
111
Total Points Won
104
|
6-2 5-7 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Malene Helgo
Player
Junri Namigata
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
84%
(
49 of
58)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jessie Aney
Player
Junri Namigata
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chia Yi Tsao
Player
Junri Namigata
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve %
68%
(
59 of
87)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
38 of
59)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
40 of
87)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Nagomi Higashitani
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
74%
(
35 of
47)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
53%
(
19 of
36)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Junri Namigata
Player
Punnin Kovapitukted
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
0
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
46 of
79)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
86%
(
6 of
7)
48%
(
41 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
56 of
113)
100
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 ret. | H2H | |||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56% (159/127) | Win/Loss | 55% (474/395) |
| 55% (361/294) | Sets Win/Loss | 54% (1072/920) |
| 52% (3096/2825) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (9386/8619) |
| 61% (118/76) | Hard Win/Loss | 51% (264/253) |
| 47% (28/32) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (20/25) |
| 33% (4/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 64% (145/80) |
| 45% (9/11) | Grass Win/Loss | 55% (45/37) |
| 0.04 | Aces Per Game | 0.04 |
| 107 | Aces Total | 319 |
| 0.05 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 150 | Total Double Faults | 1519 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 482.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 614.63 |
| 65% (2740/4229) | 1st Serve % | 62% (15879/25583) |
| 60% (1639/2740) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (9357/15879) |
| 45% (675/1495) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (4293/9704) |
| 46% (220/481) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1526/3124) |
| 43% (1859/4275) | Return Points Win % | 46% (11460/24822) |
| 56% (19/15) | Slam W/L | 31% (14/31) |
| 42% (13/18) | Masters W/L | 20% (2/8) |
| 29% (2/5) | Cups W/L | 100% (3/0) |
| 53% (75/66) | Main Tour W/L | 49% (58/61) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 69% (48/22) | Challenger W/L | 57% (375/287) |
| 67% (2/1) | Futures W/L | 73% (22/8) |
| 55% (157/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (468/854) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 60% (33/55) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/160) |
| 46% (39/84) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (137/266) |
| 83% (164/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (467/399) |
| 16% (164/26) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (467/68) |
| 17% (122/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (401/74) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
